From: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 20:33:19 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] config doc: mention future aspirations for transfer.fsckObjects
Message-ID: <CAP8UFD2wpdTnis1zcjkHFnWDN5ZB+puWrGDX4m_cFWsgvNHn5g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180525192811.25680-5-avarab@gmail.com>

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:28 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
<avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Jeff King has said on at least a couple of occasions (at least one of
> Let's note that in the documentation so we don't seem to be claiming
> that this is by design. A previous version of this change called the
> current behavior a "bug", that's probably too strong a claim, but I
> don't think anyone would dislike a hypothetical local quarantine
> patch, so let's we might change this in the future.

Maybe: s/so let's we might/so let's say we might/