Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] doc: add technical design doc for large object promisors
- From
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 27, 2025, 15:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAP8UFD1hndoGufxrex7PKNZ6L-Z+fJgOxZeT=zVjBJybkk_omw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq5xnsmima.fsf@gitster.g>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 2:28 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Hopefully I'll have time to comment on different parts of the > documents, but the impression I got was that we should write with > fewer "we could" and instead say more "we aim to", i.e. be more > assertive.
I have tried to make the next version of the document more assertive in some places and clearer in other places by replacing some "could" with other terms.