From: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 15:12:06 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] doc: add technical design doc for large object promisors
Message-ID: <CAP8UFD1hndoGufxrex7PKNZ6L-Z+fJgOxZeT=zVjBJybkk_omw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq5xnsmima.fsf@gitster.g>

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 2:28 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

> Hopefully I'll have time to comment on different parts of the
> documents, but the impression I got was that we should write with
> fewer "we could" and instead say more "we aim to", i.e. be more
> assertive.

I have tried to make the next version of the document more assertive
in some places and clearer in other places by replacing some "could"
with other terms.