Re: [PATCH 1/2] t/lib-gpg: introduce new prereq GPG2
- From
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 1, 2023, 08:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAP8UFD1FkUJ0t0OosendGBQWZJC6AbntN4r7GmaVNVKHwHEc=w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20230529192209.17747-2-five231003@gmail.com>
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 9:23 PM Kousik Sanagavarapu <five231003@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> > GnuPG v2.0.0 released in 2006, which according to its release notes > > https://gnupg.org/download/release_notes.html > > is the "First stable version of GnuPG integrating OpenPGP and S/MIME". > > Use this version or it's successors for tests that will fail for > versions less than v2.0.0 because of the difference in the output on > stderr between the versions (v2.* vs v0.* or v2.* vs v1.*). Skip if > the GPG version detected is less than v2.0.0.
Yeah, I think it's reasonable to stop worrying about the output of GPG versions that are 17 year old.
Show 6 quoted lines
> +test_lazy_prereq GPG2 ' > + gpg_version=$(gpg --version 2>&1) > + test $? != 127 || exit 1 > + > + case "$gpg_version" in > + !"gpg (GnuPG) 2."*)
Maybe something like `"gpg (GnuPG) 0."* | "gpg (GnuPG) 1."*)` would be better, as it would allow versions 3.X, 4.X, etc if they are ever released.
> + say "This test requires a GPG version >= v2.0.0" > + exit 1 > + ;;
Show 11 quoted lines
> diff --git a/t/t7510-signed-commit.sh b/t/t7510-signed-commit.sh > index ccbc416402..96b316ae01 100755 > --- a/t/t7510-signed-commit.sh > +++ b/t/t7510-signed-commit.sh > @@ -218,6 +218,13 @@ test_expect_success GPG 'amending already signed commit' ' > ! grep "BAD signature from" actual > ' > > +test_expect_success GPG2 'bare signature' ' > + git verify-commit fifth-signed 2>expect && > + echo "" >>expect &&
We sometimes use `echo "" >` to add a new line, but we much more often use just `echo >` for that purpose:
$ git grep 'echo >' | wc -l 339 $ git grep 'echo "" >' | wc -l 16
> + git log -1 --format="%GG" fifth-signed >actual && > + test_cmp expect actual > +'
Thanks!