Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] ref-filter: add support for %(contents:size)
- From
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 31, 2020, 20:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAP8UFD15+p+xKwJ=B9WVsrc+2TvLHKmu78SBCLUFZVSYoTtbbg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200731174547.GC843002@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Hi Alban and Peff,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 7:45 PM Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 07:37:22PM +0200, Alban Gruin wrote:
>
> > > + # Leave $expect unquoted to lose possible leading whitespaces
> > > + echo $expect >expected
> > > + test_expect_${4:-sucess} $PREREQ "basic atom: $1 contents:size" '
> >
> > There is a typo here, and $expect is written to `expected', but
> > `test_cmp' wants `expect'. Fixing those mistakes does not reveal any
> > broken tests.
>
> I thought at first you meant that the typo was s/expected/expect, and
> wondered how this could possibly have passed. But the typo is
> s/sucess/success/, so we were in fact not running the test at all (and
> were generating "test_expect_sucess: not found" messages to stderr, but
> outside of any test block. Yikes.
>
> Thanks for spotting.Yeah, I copied a suggestion from Junio in the last iteration without properly checking it. Sorry about that and thanks for spotting and fixing it.