From: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:10:28 GMT
Subject: Re: Promoting Git developers
Message-ID: <CAP8UFD08xoJ2H8XgfDbPfHddX9YFpFgbrY+PZ5Tphuot7JwGvw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <003001d05f71$81845160$848cf420$@nexbridge.com>

On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Randall S. Becker
<rsbecker@nexbridge.com> wrote:
>> On March 15, 2015 6:19 PM Christian Couder wrote:
> <snip>
>> Just one suggestion on the name and half a comment.
>>
>> How would "Git Review" (or "Git Monthly Review", or replace your favourite
>> "how-often-per-period-ly" in its name) sound?  I meant it to sound similar
> to
>> academic journals that summarize and review contemporary works in the
> field
>> and keeps your original "pun" about our culture around "patch reviews".

I would be ok for that but there is already this Gerrit related command:

http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/git-review

Maybe I can just use "Git Rev", but it doesn't tell that it is about news?

> If I may humbly offer the suggestion that "Git Blame" would be a far more
> appropriate pun as a name :)

You don't want me to steal Junio's blog title:

http://git-blame.blogspot.fr/

don't you?