Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] t6301: for-each-ref tests for ref-filter APIs
- From
karthik nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 16, 2015, 16:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAOLa=ZTbipvpL+RUxH5TqAVYaF+dKFLR6FDbSRE3ph4ERcXD4g@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <vpqmvzz8yr4.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> writes: > >> Add tests for 'for-each-ref' which utilizes the ref-filter APIs. >> Currently it's redundant with the tests in 't6300' but more tests >> will be eventually added as we implement more options into >> 'for-each-ref'. > > Actually, I'm not convinced that the actual tests have a real value > (since as you say, it's redundant with t6300). Perhaps we can limit this > commit to the setup. >
Well I just wanted some minimal tests, but yeah, we could limit this only to the setup.
Show 18 quoted lines
>> +++ b/t/t6301-for-each-ref-filter.sh >> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ >> +#!/bin/sh >> + >> +test_description='test for-each-refs usage of ref-filter APIs' >> + >> +. ./test-lib.sh >> +. "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-gpg.sh > > You are not using lib-gpg.sh, right? > > If first thought it was an incorrect cut-and-paste, but I actually think > that you need to setup a signed tag to properly test the --points-at > option (it does not only list refs pointing directly at a commit, but > also refs pointing at a tag pointing at the given commit). > > Such signed tag could be added here and used later in PATCH 04. >
It is a cut-paste error. Thanks will look into it.
-- Regards, Karthik Nayak