Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] bisect--helper: reimplement `bisect_log` shell function in C

>
> "Miriam R." <mirucam@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> Although I compiled and did small test on the above code snippet, don't
> >> trust it blindly and perform your own test and judge whether this is the
> >> best way to implement this shortcoming.
> > Ok, thank you.
> > I am not the original author of this subcommand reimplementation
> > and I don't know if there is a reason for the difference with the
> > error message. Maybe we can wait for some other reviewers opinion.
>
> Sorry I missed this thread.
>
> My understanding is that this topic is an attempt to "reimplement"
> what is there in the scripted version, so any deviation of behaviour
> obserbable from outside, which is *not* justified, should by
> definition be treated as a bug.
>
> If the original author did not explain why the behaviour difference
> exists and defend why the new behaviour in the reimplementation is
> better, and if you do not think of a good reason why the behaviour
> should be different and the new behaviour is better, then let's
> treat it in a bug and fix it.
>