Re: [PATCH 7/7] unpack-trees: free cache_entry array members for merges
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 30, 2013, 12:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAMP44s2=YuBLHgz52ie-FZYU5iz4o4tY0-zH+6XuzpiupjomLA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1369913664-49734-8-git-send-email-rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:34 AM, René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> wrote:
> The merge functions duplicate entries as needed and they don't free > them. Release them in unpack_nondirectories, the same function > where they were allocated, after we're done.
Ah, you beat me to this change, but..
Show 13 quoted lines
> @@ -600,9 +600,14 @@ static int unpack_nondirectories(int n, unsigned long mask,
> src[i + o->merge] = create_ce_entry(info, names + i, stage);
> }
>
> - if (o->merge)
> - return call_unpack_fn((const struct cache_entry * const *)src,
> - o);
> + if (o->merge) {
> + int rc = call_unpack_fn((const struct cache_entry * const *)src,
> + o);
> + for (i = 1; i <= n; i++)
> + if (src[i] && src[i] != o->df_conflict_entry)
> + free(src[i]);Doesn't it make more sense to follow the code above and do src[i + o->merge]?
-- Felipe Contreras