Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2013, #05; Mon, 15)
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 18, 2013, 11:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0ncfuzuYSKjkT2uQy4dGR=TSnHoJNdhU9ownDUytysL6w@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s0KW4_Q6-d-3=M7GzWmHwy4H--FcemK4UF5FS0t3wnOgg@mail.gmail.com>
Okay, one more segment needs to be responded to.
Felipe Contreras wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> If remote-hg wasn't available for users, they would be hurt; if stash > wasn't available, if rebase --interactive didn't exist, if there was > no msysgit, if it wasn't so fast, if the object model wasn't so simple > and extensible; users would be hurt. And if users didn't have all > these, there would be less users, and if there were less users, there > would be less developers, and mercurial might have been more popular, > and most repositories you have to work on would be in mercurial, and > you might be developing mercurial right now.
Flawed logic.
A large number of users doesn't automatically imply good software with lots of features, or even a great development community. A great development community leads to great software. And great software leads to lots of users. Sure, there's a feedback loop pushing users to become developers; but it doesn't start with users of vaporware, leading to more developers joining the effort to turn that vaporware into a great product.
Life doesn't begin with users.