Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2013, #05; Mon, 15)

From: Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com>
Date: Apr 19, 2013, 21:07 UTC
Message-ID: <CABURp0pyAEppU7JL350vKtFQu_qBJ6YbzXTud+L7eEoPByGvYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s2Yb+fSWYw0S7WuS-MEjKaSsnvndFw4ryZ8_Og6ioFcTQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 30 quoted lines

> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Felipe Contreras
>
>>> Yes please. Show me one of the instances where you hit a bisect with
>>> any of the remote-hg commits mentioned above by Thomas Rast.
>>
>> I made no such claim.  In fact, I have never bisected to any
>> remote-hg-related commit.  I fail to see the relevance of this
>> qualifier, though.
>
> Here, this is what you said:
>
> You:
>> Me:
>>> [skipping irrelevant comments]
>>>
>>> I'm sorry, did you actually hit an issue that required to look at the
>>> commit message to understand where the issue came from? No? Then I
>>> won't bother with hypotheticals.
>>>
>>> If you want to waste your time, by all means, rewrite all my commit
>>> messages with essays that nobody will ever read. I'm not going to do
>>> that for some hypothetical case that will never happen. I'm not going
>>> to waste my time.
>>
>> This is not a hypothetical.
>
> If something is not hypothetical, it's real, which means it actually
> happened, but then you said you never made the claim that it did. So
> what is it?

My claim:

   I bisected to a commit whose commit message helped me deduce its entirety.

Your fanciful interpretation, which I denied:

  "Show me one of the instances where you hit a bisect with
  any of the remote-hg commits mentioned above by Thomas Rast."

I have never bisected to any commit related to remote-hg, and neither did I ever claim to. I do not know where you got such a ridiculous qualifier as this to append to my statement.

> Either it did happen, or it didn't;

It did. Where "it" is my actual claim, that I bisected to a commit whose commit message helped me deduce its entirety.

But also, it didn't, where "it" is your preposterous interpretation of my interest and/or experiences with remote-hg commits.

You seem only to want to argue, Felipe. I have neither time nor interest in pig-wrestling, myself.

Phil