Re: [PATCH 0/2] "git add -A/--no-all" finishing touches
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 25, 2013, 23:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20130425235624.GO29963@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vobd2yy3c.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Do you mean files that were touched but have no content change, or >>> something more subtle?
[...]
Show 6 quoted lines
> Ahh, I haven't run anything under the debugger yet, but I think I > know what is going on. > > Don't we limit our "update-index --refresh" equivalent to the > original pathspec, even though your "-u/-A sans pathspec" warning > detection relies on grabbing the changes from the entire tree?
I think it's more basic than that. "git add" doesn't bother to run an "update-index --refresh" equivalent before its main loop unless you pass --refresh to it, since reading files to compare them to the index would be duplicated work. The files hit in update_callback() are only potentially modified.
Maybe the warning should happen after add_file_to_index() has run, letting git compare the old and new index entries for that path?
Jonathan