Re: [PATCH 1/6] revert: Don't remove the sequencer state on error
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 13, 2011, 12:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0mP50YPAuskBueokUpAHaPBRSh7yc8sR6OQ8cVM4hQppg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110811192047.GE2277@elie.gateway.2wire.net>
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Why bother, > when the behavior is suppressed altogether later in the series?
Actually, this patch helped me while debugging: I'd originally intended for it to go into 'maint'. Things have changed though- the 'sequencer-stable' is close to hitting 'next', and this series seems to be close behind*; I'll drop this patch altogether during the re-roll.
Thanks for making me explain this :)
-- Ram