Re: [PATCH 5/6] sequencer: Expose API to cherry-picking machinery
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 11, 2011, 23:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vk4ajo6hk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110811215650.GA13839@elie.gateway.2wire.net>
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Another thought. I wonder if it's possible to leave > sequencer_parse_args() private to builtin/revert.c, making the split > a little more logical: > > - the builtin takes responsibility for its commandline interface > - the library takes over once the builtin has figured out what the > user wanted.
That's a very natural separation of tasks.