From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:33:32 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] revert: Don't remove the sequencer state on error
Message-ID: <CALkWK0mP50YPAuskBueokUpAHaPBRSh7yc8sR6OQ8cVM4hQppg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110811192047.GE2277@elie.gateway.2wire.net>

Hi Jonathan,

Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Why bother,
> when the behavior is suppressed altogether later in the series?

Actually, this patch helped me while debugging:  I'd originally
intended for it to go into 'maint'.  Things have changed though- the
'sequencer-stable' is close to hitting 'next', and this series seems
to be close behind*; I'll drop this patch altogether during the
re-roll.

Thanks for making me explain this :)

-- Ram