Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sequencer: working around historical mistakes
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 13, 2011, 10:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0kMvHj6ZfMqZwZ91PV88d0wmSRZim6jQ12Mm3xqsVoWDg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20111105234312.GB27272@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net>
Hi,
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Shouldn't it be based against rr/revert-cherry-pick, rather than > "next" which is more of a moving target?
When I read this, I went: "Now why didn't I think of that?"
Thanks.
-- Ram