From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:42:01 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sequencer: working around historical mistakes
Message-ID: <CALkWK0kMvHj6ZfMqZwZ91PV88d0wmSRZim6jQ12Mm3xqsVoWDg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20111105234312.GB27272@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net>

Hi,

Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Shouldn't it be based against rr/revert-cherry-pick, rather than
> "next" which is more of a moving target?

When I read this, I went: "Now why didn't I think of that?"

Thanks.

-- Ram