Re: [PATCH 5/5] sequencer: revert d3f4628e
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 12, 2011, 16:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CALkWK0=QHUeKH6ccVLYJVW_RxXbEaLfwafTVzJ94+s49j=8QjA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20111106004257.GG27272@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net>
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Nieder writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Is this patch just reverting a previous patch? If so, why doesn't the > commit message use the usual format > > Revert "<commit message>" > > This reverts commit <unabbreviated object name>. > > <explanation> > [...]
I'd have loved to use 'git revert d3f4628e', but that ends up creating a lot more work: recall the big move made by 1/5? I'm trying to "effectively port the inverse of the changes made by d3f4628e in revert.c to sequencer.c" -- would you still like to see a git-revert style commit message? Don't you think it'll be misleading?
Sorry about the shoddy commit messages though: I'm polishing the series now that I'm convinced that it's heading in the right direction. Hopefully, I'll have more to show soon.
Thanks.
-- Ram