Re: [PATCH 15/18] the beginning of the signed push
- From
Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com>
- Date
- Aug 20, 2014, 06:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAKPyHN0Q2bCiNy0goxZ7YnmPjbU9fyjpWYmPF8gKz8T862jvAA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1408485987-3590-16-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com>
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> The basic flow based on this mechanism goes like this: > > 1. You push out your work with "git push -s". > > 2. The sending side learns where the remote refs are as usual, > together with what protocol extension the receiving end > supports. If the receiving end does not advertise the protocol > extension "push-cert", the sending side falls back to the normal > push that is not signed. >
Is this fallback silently? If so I think it would be better to abort the push, if the receiver does not support this but the user requested it.
Bert