Re: [PATCH 00/18] Signed push

No code == no substance might be a stretch, but definitely fair enough.

I thought the idea was clear enough, but I can flesh it out if desired. The particular advantage I saw in it is that it would reuse the existing object infrastructure, and extend to branches the first-class treatment that [signed] tags already get. I.e., generality. Other benefits include the ability to fetch and view a remote branch's object and its history (which would represent branch history in detail and with metadata that would otherwise not be available).

I'm not interested in pushing something different when you already have code that would achieve much of what I'd wanted. At this point my interest is in seeing if the architecture would be "purer" (in some sense) by reusing existing infrastructure.

Nico --