Re: Should git-remote-hg/bzr be part of the core?

From: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>
Date: May 12, 2014, 13:45 UTC
Message-ID: <CAHVLzckDnfFQpZ-u8qdmKqaCNk62b_K_yinfamBPgm1oST1eLQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5370c32d7ffc7_168f13a72fc6b@nysa.notmuch>

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>wrote:
> >

Show 12 quoted lines

> > While I agree with you the this project is managed in a bit conservative
> > way
>
> Only a bit? I don't think I've been involed in a more conservative open
> source project.
>
> > you should really improve how you communicate with other developers,
> > it's such a pity your contributions are some times not included in
> > git.git just because of your attitude.
>
> But that's a theory. You don't *know* that they would have been included
> had I used a different attitude.

Well, you could at least try to act and communicate differently.

Show 5 quoted lines

> In fact, people have contacted me privately saying similar things, and
> I'll give you the same challenge I gave them. If you think a different
> attitude would get my patches in, how about *you* write the commit
> messages and the discussions for one of my stuck patch series. I'll send
> the mails as if I had written the content.

No, sorry but I'm NOT interested in lying to git community.

Ciao,

-- 
Paolo