Re: Should git-remote-hg/bzr be part of the core?
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 12, 2014, 17:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <5371012674244_222d1297308d1@nysa.notmuch>
- In-Reply-To
- <5370D015.10300@alum.mit.edu>
Michael Haggerty wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On 05/12/2014 02:29 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > Michael Haggerty wrote: > > [...] > >> 2. Moving git-remote-hg into the core would require you to continue your > >> presence on the Git mailing list. > > > > That is another red herring. Moving them back to the contrib/ area which > > is what Junio proposed would also require my presence on the list. Is > > that what you want? > > No, actually my preference is that git-remote-hg be separated from the > Git project altogether, for the reasons that I stated earlier.
Exactly. So your point 2. is completely irrelevant to the contrb/ vs. core debate.
-- Felipe Contreras