Re: Should git-remote-hg/bzr be part of the core?

> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>wrote:
> 
> > > While I agree with you the this project is managed in a bit conservative
> > > way
> >
> > Only a bit? I don't think I've been involed in a more conservative open
> > source project.
> >
> > > you should really improve how you communicate with other developers,
> > > it's such a pity your contributions are some times not included in
> > > git.git just because of your attitude.
> >
> > But that's a theory. You don't *know* that they would have been included
> > had I used a different attitude.
> 
> Well, you could at least try to act and communicate differently.

> > In fact, people have contacted me privately saying similar things, and
> > I'll give you the same challenge I gave them. If you think a different
> > attitude would get my patches in, how about *you* write the commit
> > messages and the discussions for one of my stuck patch series. I'll send
> > the mails as if I had written the content.
> 
> No, sorry but I'm NOT interested in lying to git community.