Re: Git is not scalable with too many refs/*
Heya,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 17:48, Martin Fick <mfick@codeaurora.org> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Hmm, I was thinking that too, and I just did a test.
>
> Instead of storing the changes under refs/changes, I fetched
> them under refs/heads/changes and then ran git 1.7.6 and it
> took about 3 mins. Then, I ran the 1.7.7.rc0.73 with
> c774aab98ce6c5ef7aaacbef38da0a501eb671d4 reverted and it
> only took 13s! So, if this indeed tests what you were
> suggesting, I think it shows that even in the intended case
> this change slowed things down?
And if you run 1.7.7 without that commit reverted?
--
Cheers,
Sverre Rabbelier