Re: Git is not scalable with too many refs/*
- From
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 27, 2011, 10:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8Dxj72U+wiu6MUV3sQYso948Gi6DhTLSO7=ddt6BxdBYQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAGdFq_j2aa8bwxWuJvEsgA_1zkR4mMzoKjGs9TQVqw+0XYr98A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Heya, > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:01, Julian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk> wrote: >> It has to be hot-cache, otherwise time taken to read the refs from disk will >> mean that it is always slow. On my Mac it seems to _always_ be slow reading >> the refs from disk, so even the "fast" case still takes ~17m. > > Ah, that seems unfortunate. Not sure how to test it then.
If you care about performance, a perf test suite could be made, perhaps as a separate project. The output would be charts or spreadsheets, that interesting parties can look at and point out regressions. We may start with a set of common used operations.
-- Duy