From: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:56:50 GMT
Subject: Re: Git is not scalable with too many refs/*
Message-ID: <CAGdFq_hRmSif4=V+9h8=S1fWfPCj+meRY8xGyfgv=SWk+DrBQw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201109260948.25312.mfick@codeaurora.org>

Heya,

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 17:48, Martin Fick <mfick@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Hmm, I was thinking that too, and I just did a test.
>
> Instead of storing the changes under refs/changes, I fetched
> them under refs/heads/changes and then ran git 1.7.6 and it
> took about 3 mins.  Then, I ran the 1.7.7.rc0.73 with
> c774aab98ce6c5ef7aaacbef38da0a501eb671d4 reverted and it
> only took 13s!  So, if this indeed tests what you were
> suggesting, I think it shows that even in the intended case
> this change slowed things down?

And if you run 1.7.7 without that commit reverted?

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier