Re: Git is not scalable with too many refs/*
> Julian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk> wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:12:31 -0600, Martin Fick wrote:
>That sounds a lot better. Hopefully other commands should be faster
>now too.
Yeah, I will try this in a few other places to see.
Show 8 quoted lines
>> Thanks way much!!!
>
>No problem. Thank you for all the time you've put in to help chase
>this down. Makes it so much easier when the person with original
>problem mucks in with the investigation.
>Just think how much time you've saved for anyone with a large number of
>
>those Gerrit change refs ;)
Perhaps this is a naive question, but why are all these refs being put into a list to be sorted, only to be discarded soon thereafter anyway? After all, git branch knows that it isn't going to print these, and the refs are stored precategorized, so why not only grab the refs which matter upfront?
-Martin