Re: [PATCH 3/3] protocol docs: explain receive-pack push options
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- May 6, 2017, 00:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kb5vQ6_3j6r7szDvXtOdCSx6-HUeMuC9yjgMHL0jvA5BQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <615007182a5e205a7074317a4c8788aa4eb009ff.1494027001.git.jonathantanmy@google.com>
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> wrote:
Show 47 quoted lines
> Support for push options in the receive-pack protocol (and all Git
> components that speak it) have been added over a few commits, but not
> fully documented (especially its interaction with signed pushes). Update
> the protocol documentation to include the relevant details.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
> ---
> Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
> index 5b0ba3ef2..cf7cb48c3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
> @@ -473,13 +473,10 @@ that it wants to update, it sends a line listing the obj-id currently on
> the server, the obj-id the client would like to update it to and the name
> of the reference.
>
> -This list is followed by a flush-pkt. Then the push options are transmitted
> -one per packet followed by another flush-pkt. After that the packfile that
> -should contain all the objects that the server will need to complete the new
> -references will be sent.
> +This list is followed by a flush-pkt.
>
> ----
> - update-request = *shallow ( command-list | push-cert ) [packfile]
> + update-request = *shallow ( command-list | push-cert )
>
> shallow = PKT-LINE("shallow" SP obj-id)
>
> @@ -500,12 +497,35 @@ references will be sent.
> PKT-LINE("pusher" SP ident LF)
> PKT-LINE("pushee" SP url LF)
> PKT-LINE("nonce" SP nonce LF)
> + *PKT-LINE("push-option" SP push-option LF)
> PKT-LINE(LF)
> *PKT-LINE(command LF)
> *PKT-LINE(gpg-signature-lines LF)
> PKT-LINE("push-cert-end" LF)
>
> - packfile = "PACK" 28*(OCTET)
> + push-option = 1*CHAR
> +----
> +
> +If the server has advertised the 'push-options' capability and the client has
> +specified 'push-options' as part of the capability list above, the client then
> +sends its push options followed by a flush-pkt.The CHAR of the push-options SHOULD NOT include an LF. Well I guess that may be obvious when looking at PKT-LINE("push-option" SP push-option LF), not sure if we want to mention it here.
Show 10 quoted lines
> + > +---- > + push-options = *PKT-LINE(push-option) flush-pkt > +---- > + > +For backwards compatibility with older Git servers, if the client sends a push > +cert and push options, it SHOULD send its push options both embedded within the > +push cert and after the push cert. (Note that the push options within the cert > +are prefixed, but the push options after the cert are not.) Both these lists > +SHOULD be consistent.
s/SHOULD/MUST/ ?
Show 12 quoted lines
> + > +After that the packfile that > +should contain all the objects that the server will need to complete the new > +references will be sent. > + > +---- > + packfile = "PACK" 28*(OCTET) > ---- > > If the receiving end does not support delete-refs, the sending end MUST > -- > 2.13.0.rc1.294.g07d810a77f-goog
Thanks for writing the docs.
Stefan
>