Re: [PATCH 0/2] Make diff plumbing commands respect the indentHeuristic.

> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:34:15AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>> > So instead I chose to make the indentHeuristic option part of diff's basic
>> > configuration, and in each of the diff plumbing commands I moved the call to
>> > git_config() before the call to init_revisions().
>> [...]
>>
>> The feature was included in v2.11 (released 2016-11-29) and we got no
>> negative feedback. Quite the opposite, all feedback we got, was positive.
>> This could be explained by having the feature as an experimental feature
>> and users who would be broken by it, did not test it yet or did not speak up.
>
> Yeah, if the point you're trying to make is "nobody will be mad if this
> is turned on by default", I don't think shipping it as a config option
> is very conclusive.
>
> I think a more interesting argument is: we turned on renames by default
> a few versions ago, which changes the diff in a much bigger way, and
> nobody complained.
>
>   As a side note, I do happen to know of one program that depends
>   heavily on diffs remaining stable. Imagine you have a Git hosting site
>   which lets people comment on lines of diffs. You need some way to
>   address the lines of the diff so that the annotations appear in the
>   correct position when you regenerate the diff later.
>
>   One way to do it is to just position the comment at the n'th line of
>   the diff. Which obviously breaks if the diff changes. IMHO that is a
>   bug in that program, which should be fixed to use the line numbers
>   from the original blob (which is still not foolproof, because a
>   different diff algorithm may move a change such that the line isn't
>   even part of the diff anymore).
>
>   I'm not worried about this particular program, as I happen to know it
>   has already been fixed. But it's possible others have made a similar
>   mistake.

>> So I'd propose to turn it on by default and anyone negatively impacted by that
>> could then use the config to turn it off for themselves (including plumbing).
>>
>> Something like this, maybe?
>
> Yeah, as long as this is on top of Marc's patches, I think it is the
> natural conclusion that we had planned.

> I don't know if we would want to be extra paranoid about patch-ids.
> There is no helping:
>
>   git rev-list HEAD | git diff-tree --stdin -p | git patch-id --stable
>
> because diff-tree doesn't know that it's trying for "--stable" output.
> But the diffs we compute internally for patch-id could disable the
> heuristics. I'm not sure if those matter, though. AFAIK those are used
> only for internal comparisons within a single program. I.e., we never
> compare them against input from the user, nor do we output them to the
> user. So they'll change, but I don't think anybody would care.
>
> -Peff