Re: [PATCH] push: change submodule default to check
- From
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
- Date
- Oct 4, 2016, 18:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGZ79kYQsXxzXihtzC70Oj29RAe=8+nuJeUWNmbF17C75xbEag@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq7f9ouh1t.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > >> Actually, I like that a bit better. It would not cover the case where >> you have not actually checked out any of the submodules (or at least not >> called "submodule init", I guess?). But arguably that is a sign that the >> auto-recurse behavior should not be kicking in anyway. > > Yeah, the "no init, no recursion" line of thought is very sensible. > I like it. >
Bear in mind that "submodule init" only fuzzes around with .git/config. It doesn't touch .git/modules (i.e. cloning/fetching), that is to be done with the update command.
So if we also want to cover the case of init'd submodules, but not cloned/checked out submodules, we'd rather want to consult .git/config whether there is any submodule.* option set, though that seems more expensive than just checking for files inside the modules directory.