Re: Slow pushes on 'pu' - even when up-to-date..

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > As I argued in [1], I think it's not just "this must be cheaper" but
> > "this must not be enabled if submodules are not in use at all".  Most
> > repositories don't have submodules enabled at all, so anything that
> > cause any extra traversal, even of a portion of the history, is going to
> > be a net negative for a lot of people.
> >
> > I think the only sane default is going to be some kind of heuristic that
> > says "submodules are probably in use".
> 
> Why should we even have a default different from today's?  If most
> repositories don't have submodules enabled at all, we can just let
> those working with submodules enabled to toggle their configuration
> and that is an very easy to understand solution, no?