Re: [PATCH v4] git-prompt: make colourization consistent
- From
Justin Donnelly <justinrdonnelly@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 4, 2022, 17:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAGTqyRxS9aBitVivSTqojX_C_VBdgrD7JkUKgKSE6apjabzvQg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20220604161333.54627-1-joak-pet@online.no>
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 12:13 PM Joakim Petersen <joak-pet@online.no> wrote:
Show 237 quoted lines
>
> The short upstream state indicator inherits the colour of the last short
> state indicator before it (if there is one), and the sparsity state
> indicator inherits this colour as well. Make the colourization of these
> state indicators consistent by making all colourized indicators clear
> their own colour.
>
> As of 0ec7c23cdc6 (git-prompt: make upstream state indicator location
> consistent, 2022-02-27), colourization in the output of __git_ps1 has
> changed such that the short upstream state indicator inherits the colour
> of the last short state indicator before it (if there is one), while
> before this change it was white/the default text colour. Some examples
> to illustrate this behaviour (assuming all indicators are enabled and
> colourization is on):
> * If there is something in the stash, both the '$' and the short
> upstream state indicator following it will be blue.
> * If the local tree has new, untracked files and there is nothing in
> the stash, both the '%' and the short upstream state indicator
> will be red.
> * If all local changes are added to the index and the stash is empty,
> both the '+' and the short upstream state indicator following it will
> be green.
> * If the local tree is clean and there is nothing in the stash, the
> short upstream state indicator will be white/${default text colour}.
>
> This appears to be an unintended side-effect of the change, and makes
> little sense semantically (e.g. why is it bad to be in sync with
> upstream when you have uncommitted local changes?). The cause of the
> change is that previously, the short upstream state indicator appeared
> immediately after the rebase/revert/bisect/merge state indicator (note
> the position of $p in $gitstring):
>
> local f="$h$w$i$s$u"
> local gitstring="$c$b${f:+$z$f}${sparse}$r$p"
>
> Said indicator is prepended with the clear colour code, and the short
> upstream state indicator is thus also uncoloured. Now, the short
> upstream state indicator follows the sequence of colourized indicators,
> without any clearing of colour (again note the position of $p, now in
> $f):
>
> local f="$h$w$i$s$u$p"
> local gitstring="$c$b${f:+$z$f}${sparse}$r${upstream}"
>
> If the user is in a sparse checkout, the sparsity state indicator
> follows a similar pattern to the short upstream state indicator.
> However, clearing colour of the colourized indicators changes how the
> sparsity state indicator is colourized , as it currently inherits (and
> before the change referenced also inherited) the colour of the last
> short state indicator before it. Reading the commit message of the
> change that introduced the sparsity state indicator, afda36dbf3b
> (git-prompt: include sparsity state as well, 2020-06-21), it appears
> this colourization also was unintended, so clearing the colour for said
> indicator further increases consistency.
>
> Colouring of $c was made dependent on it not being empty, as it is no
> longer being used to colour the branch name. Removal of $b's prefix was
> moved to before the colourization so it gets cleared properly now that
> colour codes are inserted into it.
>
> Due to colour clearing being moved into the variables for each coloured
> indicator, the tests for the coloured Bash prompt had to be changed:
> * All colour tests now have the colour codes around the expected
> content of the expanded $__git_ps1_branch_name variable instead of
> the unexpanded variable in the string.
> * The test with two indicators had a clear-colour code inserted after
> the symbol for the first indicator, since all indicators clear their
> own colours now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Petersen <joak-pet@online.no>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> * All colourized variables now also clear their own colour.
> * Variables are only coloured if they are not empty, except $b (branch
> name), which is not an optional indicator.
> * Updated tests to reflect the new colourization behaviour.
> * Fixed a mistake in two of the examples; the stash indicator is the
> last of the short state indicators preceding the short upstream state
> indicator.
>
> Range-diff against v3:
> 1: 0e107d0496 < -: ---------- git-prompt: make colourization consistent
> -: ---------- > 1: 98ce78ddc5 git-prompt: make colourization consistent
>
> contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh | 20 +++++++++++---------
> t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh | 18 +++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh b/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh
> index 87b2b916c0..32bb98bb8d 100644
> --- a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh
> +++ b/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh
> @@ -245,7 +245,8 @@ __git_ps1_show_upstream ()
>
> # Helper function that is meant to be called from __git_ps1. It
> # injects color codes into the appropriate gitstring variables used
> -# to build a gitstring.
> +# to build a gitstring. Colored variables are responsible for clearing
> +# their own color.
> __git_ps1_colorize_gitstring ()
> {
> if [[ -n ${ZSH_VERSION-} ]]; then
> @@ -271,22 +272,23 @@ __git_ps1_colorize_gitstring ()
> else
> branch_color="$bad_color"
> fi
> - c="$branch_color$c"
> + if [ -n "$c" ]; then
> + c="$branch_color$c$c_clear"
> + fi
> + b="$branch_color$b$c_clear"
>
> - z="$c_clear$z"
> if [ "$w" = "*" ]; then
> - w="$bad_color$w"
> + w="$bad_color$w$c_clear"
> fi
> if [ -n "$i" ]; then
> - i="$ok_color$i"
> + i="$ok_color$i$c_clear"
> fi
> if [ -n "$s" ]; then
> - s="$flags_color$s"
> + s="$flags_color$s$c_clear"
> fi
> if [ -n "$u" ]; then
> - u="$bad_color$u"
> + u="$bad_color$u$c_clear"
> fi
> - r="$c_clear$r"
> }
>
> # Helper function to read the first line of a file into a variable.
> @@ -554,6 +556,7 @@ __git_ps1 ()
> fi
> fi
>
> + b=${b##refs/heads/}
> local z="${GIT_PS1_STATESEPARATOR-" "}"
>
> # NO color option unless in PROMPT_COMMAND mode or it's Zsh
> @@ -563,7 +566,6 @@ __git_ps1 ()
> fi
> fi
>
> - b=${b##refs/heads/}
> if [ $pcmode = yes ] && [ $ps1_expanded = yes ]; then
> __git_ps1_branch_name=$b
> b="\${__git_ps1_branch_name}"
> diff --git a/t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh b/t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh
> index bbd513bab0..abd82eec35 100755
> --- a/t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh
> +++ b/t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh
> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - pc mode' '
> '
>
> test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - branch name' '
> - printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> + printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
> (
> GIT_PS1_SHOWCOLORHINTS=y &&
> __git_ps1 "BEFORE:" ":AFTER" >"$actual" &&
> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - branch name' '
> '
>
> test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - detached head' '
> - printf "BEFORE: (${c_red}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear}):AFTER\\n(%s...)" $(git log -1 --format="%h" b1^) >expected &&
> + printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name}):AFTER\\n${c_red}(%s...)"${c_clear} $(git log -1 --format="%h" b1^) >expected &&
> git checkout b1^ &&
> test_when_finished "git checkout main" &&
> (
> @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - detached head' '
> '
>
> test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirty worktree' '
> - printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_red}*${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> + printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_red}*${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
> echo "dirty" >file &&
> test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
> (
> @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirt
> '
>
> test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirty index' '
> - printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_green}+${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> + printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_green}+${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
> echo "dirty" >file &&
> test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
> git add -u &&
> @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirt
> '
>
> test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirty index and worktree' '
> - printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_red}*${c_green}+${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> + printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_red}*${c_clear}${c_green}+${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
> echo "dirty index" >file &&
> test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
> git add -u &&
> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirt
> '
>
> test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - before root commit' '
> - printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_green}#${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> + printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_green}#${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
> (
> GIT_PS1_SHOWDIRTYSTATE=y &&
> GIT_PS1_SHOWCOLORHINTS=y &&
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - befo
> '
>
> test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - inside .git directory' '
> - printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear}):AFTER\\nGIT_DIR!" >expected &&
> + printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name}):AFTER\\n${c_green}GIT_DIR!${c_clear}" >expected &&
> echo "dirty" >file &&
> test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
> (
> @@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - inside .git directory' '
> '
>
> test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - stash status indicator' '
> - printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_lblue}\$${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> + printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_lblue}\$${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
> echo 2 >file &&
> git stash &&
> test_when_finished "git stash drop" &&
> @@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - stash status indicator' '
> '
>
> test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - untracked files status indicator' '
> - printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_red}%%${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> + printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_red}%%${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
> (
> GIT_PS1_SHOWUNTRACKEDFILES=y &&
> GIT_PS1_SHOWCOLORHINTS=y &&
> --
> 2.36.1
>I like this solution. This isn't new, but does anybody know if there is a reason why `$w` is compared for equality to "*" as opposed to just checking whether it's a nonempty value (`-n`)? I think I'd generally prefer it to be consistent with the others, which has the added benefit of continuing to work if the asterisk is ever changed to something else.