git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH v4] git-prompt: make colourization consistent

From
Justin Donnelly <justinrdonnelly@gmail.com>
Date
Jun 4, 2022, 17:30 UTC
Message-ID
<CAGTqyRxS9aBitVivSTqojX_C_VBdgrD7JkUKgKSE6apjabzvQg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<20220604161333.54627-1-joak-pet@online.no>
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 12:13 PM Joakim Petersen <joak-pet@online.no> wrote:
Show 237 quoted lines
>
> The short upstream state indicator inherits the colour of the last short
> state indicator before it (if there is one), and the sparsity state
> indicator inherits this colour as well. Make the colourization of these
> state indicators consistent by making all colourized indicators clear
> their own colour.
>
> As of 0ec7c23cdc6 (git-prompt: make upstream state indicator location
> consistent, 2022-02-27), colourization in the output of __git_ps1 has
> changed such that the short upstream state indicator inherits the colour
> of the last short state indicator before it (if there is one), while
> before this change it was white/the default text colour. Some examples
> to illustrate this behaviour (assuming all indicators are enabled and
> colourization is on):
>  * If there is something in the stash, both the '$' and the short
>    upstream state indicator following it will be blue.
>  * If the local tree has new, untracked files and there is nothing in
>    the stash, both the '%' and the    short upstream state indicator
>    will be red.
>  * If all local changes are added to the index and the stash is empty,
>    both the '+' and the short upstream state indicator following it will
>    be green.
>  * If the local tree is clean and there is nothing in the stash, the
>    short upstream state indicator will be white/${default text colour}.
>
> This appears to be an unintended side-effect of the change, and makes
> little sense semantically (e.g. why is it bad to be in sync with
> upstream when you have uncommitted local changes?). The cause of the
> change is that previously, the short upstream state indicator appeared
> immediately after the rebase/revert/bisect/merge state indicator (note
> the position of $p in $gitstring):
>
>         local f="$h$w$i$s$u"
>         local gitstring="$c$b${f:+$z$f}${sparse}$r$p"
>
> Said indicator is prepended with the clear colour code, and the short
> upstream state indicator is thus also uncoloured. Now, the short
> upstream state indicator follows the sequence of colourized indicators,
> without any clearing of colour (again note the position of $p, now in
> $f):
>
>         local f="$h$w$i$s$u$p"
>         local gitstring="$c$b${f:+$z$f}${sparse}$r${upstream}"
>
> If the user is in a sparse checkout, the sparsity state indicator
> follows a similar pattern to the short upstream state indicator.
> However, clearing colour of the colourized indicators changes how the
> sparsity state indicator is colourized , as it currently inherits (and
> before the change referenced also inherited) the colour of the last
> short state indicator before it. Reading the commit message of the
> change that introduced the sparsity state indicator, afda36dbf3b
> (git-prompt: include sparsity state as well, 2020-06-21), it appears
> this colourization also was unintended, so clearing the colour for said
> indicator further increases consistency.
>
> Colouring of $c was made dependent on it not being empty, as it is no
> longer being used to colour the branch name. Removal of $b's prefix was
> moved to before the colourization so it gets cleared properly now that
> colour codes are inserted into it.
>
> Due to colour clearing being moved into the variables for each coloured
> indicator, the tests for the coloured Bash prompt had to be changed:
>  * All colour tests now have the colour codes around the expected
>    content of the expanded $__git_ps1_branch_name variable instead of
>    the unexpanded variable in the string.
>  * The test with two indicators had a clear-colour code inserted after
>    the symbol for the first indicator, since all indicators clear their
>    own colours now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Petersen <joak-pet@online.no>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
>  * All colourized variables now also clear their own colour.
>  * Variables are only coloured if they are not empty, except $b (branch
>    name), which is not an optional indicator.
>  * Updated tests to reflect the new colourization behaviour.
>  * Fixed a mistake in two of the examples; the stash indicator is the
>    last of the short state indicators preceding the short upstream state
>    indicator.
>
> Range-diff against v3:
> 1:  0e107d0496 < -:  ---------- git-prompt: make colourization consistent
> -:  ---------- > 1:  98ce78ddc5 git-prompt: make colourization consistent
>
>  contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh | 20 +++++++++++---------
>  t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh           | 18 +++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh b/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh
> index 87b2b916c0..32bb98bb8d 100644
> --- a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh
> +++ b/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh
> @@ -245,7 +245,8 @@ __git_ps1_show_upstream ()
>
>  # Helper function that is meant to be called from __git_ps1.  It
>  # injects color codes into the appropriate gitstring variables used
> -# to build a gitstring.
> +# to build a gitstring. Colored variables are responsible for clearing
> +# their own color.
>  __git_ps1_colorize_gitstring ()
>  {
>         if [[ -n ${ZSH_VERSION-} ]]; then
> @@ -271,22 +272,23 @@ __git_ps1_colorize_gitstring ()
>         else
>                 branch_color="$bad_color"
>         fi
> -       c="$branch_color$c"
> +       if [ -n "$c" ]; then
> +               c="$branch_color$c$c_clear"
> +       fi
> +       b="$branch_color$b$c_clear"
>
> -       z="$c_clear$z"
>         if [ "$w" = "*" ]; then
> -               w="$bad_color$w"
> +               w="$bad_color$w$c_clear"
>         fi
>         if [ -n "$i" ]; then
> -               i="$ok_color$i"
> +               i="$ok_color$i$c_clear"
>         fi
>         if [ -n "$s" ]; then
> -               s="$flags_color$s"
> +               s="$flags_color$s$c_clear"
>         fi
>         if [ -n "$u" ]; then
> -               u="$bad_color$u"
> +               u="$bad_color$u$c_clear"
>         fi
> -       r="$c_clear$r"
>  }
>
>  # Helper function to read the first line of a file into a variable.
> @@ -554,6 +556,7 @@ __git_ps1 ()
>                 fi
>         fi
>
> +       b=${b##refs/heads/}
>         local z="${GIT_PS1_STATESEPARATOR-" "}"
>
>         # NO color option unless in PROMPT_COMMAND mode or it's Zsh
> @@ -563,7 +566,6 @@ __git_ps1 ()
>                 fi
>         fi
>
> -       b=${b##refs/heads/}
>         if [ $pcmode = yes ] && [ $ps1_expanded = yes ]; then
>                 __git_ps1_branch_name=$b
>                 b="\${__git_ps1_branch_name}"
> diff --git a/t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh b/t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh
> index bbd513bab0..abd82eec35 100755
> --- a/t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh
> +++ b/t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh
> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - pc mode' '
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - branch name' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
>         (
>                 GIT_PS1_SHOWCOLORHINTS=y &&
>                 __git_ps1 "BEFORE:" ":AFTER" >"$actual" &&
> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - branch name' '
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - detached head' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_red}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear}):AFTER\\n(%s...)" $(git log -1 --format="%h" b1^) >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name}):AFTER\\n${c_red}(%s...)"${c_clear} $(git log -1 --format="%h" b1^) >expected &&
>         git checkout b1^ &&
>         test_when_finished "git checkout main" &&
>         (
> @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - detached head' '
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirty worktree' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_red}*${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_red}*${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
>         echo "dirty" >file &&
>         test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
>         (
> @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirt
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirty index' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_green}+${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_green}+${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
>         echo "dirty" >file &&
>         test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
>         git add -u &&
> @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirt
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirty index and worktree' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_red}*${c_green}+${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_red}*${c_clear}${c_green}+${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
>         echo "dirty index" >file &&
>         test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
>         git add -u &&
> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirt
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - before root commit' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_green}#${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_green}#${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
>         (
>                 GIT_PS1_SHOWDIRTYSTATE=y &&
>                 GIT_PS1_SHOWCOLORHINTS=y &&
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - befo
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - inside .git directory' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear}):AFTER\\nGIT_DIR!" >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name}):AFTER\\n${c_green}GIT_DIR!${c_clear}" >expected &&
>         echo "dirty" >file &&
>         test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
>         (
> @@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - inside .git directory' '
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - stash status indicator' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_lblue}\$${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_lblue}\$${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
>         echo 2 >file &&
>         git stash &&
>         test_when_finished "git stash drop" &&
> @@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - stash status indicator' '
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - untracked files status indicator' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_red}%%${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_red}%%${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
>         (
>                 GIT_PS1_SHOWUNTRACKEDFILES=y &&
>                 GIT_PS1_SHOWCOLORHINTS=y &&
> --
> 2.36.1
>

I like this solution. This isn't new, but does anybody know if there is a reason why `$w` is compared for equality to "*" as opposed to just checking whether it's a nonempty value (`-n`)? I think I'd generally prefer it to be consistent with the others, which has the added benefit of continuing to work if the asterisk is ever changed to something else.

Previous: Joakim PetersenNext: Joakim Petersen
Message 21 of 43 in “git-prompt: make colourization consistent”
  1. git-prompt: make colourization consistentJoakim Petersen, Jun 1, 2022
  2. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonJun 1, 2022
  3. Joakim PetersenJun 1, 2022
  4. Junio C HamanoJun 1, 2022
  5. Joakim PetersenJun 1, 2022
  6. Junio C HamanoJun 1, 2022
  7. git-prompt: make colourization consistentJoakim Petersen, Jun 2, 2022
  8. joak-pet@online.noJun 2, 2022
  9. Junio C HamanoJun 2, 2022
  10. Joakim PetersenJun 3, 2022
  11. git-prompt: make colourization consistentJoakim Petersen, Jun 3, 2022
  12. Junio C HamanoJun 3, 2022
  13. Joakim PetersenJun 3, 2022
  14. Joakim PetersenJun 3, 2022
  15. Justin DonnellyJun 3, 2022
  16. Junio C HamanoJun 3, 2022
  17. Joakim PetersenJun 4, 2022
  18. Junio C HamanoJun 6, 2022
  19. Junio C HamanoJun 3, 2022
  20. git-prompt: make colourization consistentJoakim Petersen, Jun 4, 2022
  21. Justin DonnellyJun 4, 2022
  22. Joakim PetersenJun 4, 2022
  23. git-prompt: make colourization consistentJoakim Petersen, Jun 4, 2022
  24. Bagas SanjayaJun 6, 2022
  25. Junio C HamanoJun 7, 2022
  26. Joakim PetersenJun 9, 2022
  27. Junio C HamanoJun 6, 2022
  28. Joakim PetersenJun 6, 2022
  29. Junio C HamanoJun 6, 2022
  30. Joakim PetersenJun 7, 2022
  31. git-prompt: make colourization consistentJoakim Petersen, Jun 6, 2022
  32. git-prompt: make colourization consistentJoakim Petersen, Jun 7, 2022
  33. Junio C HamanoJun 7, 2022
  34. Joakim PetersenJun 9, 2022
  35. SZEDER GáborJun 9, 2022
  36. Joakim PetersenJun 9, 2022
  37. Junio C HamanoJun 9, 2022
  38. SZEDER GáborJun 11, 2022
  39. git-prompt: make colouring consistentJoakim Petersen, Jun 9, 2022
  40. git-prompt: fix expansion of branch colour codesJoakim Petersen, Jun 9, 2022
  41. Junio C HamanoJun 10, 2022
  42. Joakim PetersenJun 10, 2022
  43. git-prompt: fix expansion of branch colour codesJoakim Petersen, Jun 10, 2022

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.