Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] strbuf: clarify API boundary

> Sorry, I meant to send a follow-up to my previous email[1] but forgot.
> In particular, I wanted to say that I think the second part of the
> above comment (the "however" and everything which follows) ought to be
> dropped since it will become stale once those "older functions" are
> finally removed; it is likely nobody will remember to update this
> comment. So, the above could rewritten something like this:
>
>  /*
>   * NOTE FOR STRBUF DEVELOPERS
>   *
>   * strbuf is a low-level primitive; as such it should interact only
>   * with other low-level primitives. Do not introduce new functions
>   * which interact with higher-level APIs.
>   */