Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] branch: reject -D/-d without branch name
- From
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 26, 2013, 03:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACsJy8B1YS6EDNFzDL3zJiy5tb3Qn=0xxyZgSnQh4KM6yNNKpw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vham53x01.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> writes: > >> --- >> builtin/branch.c | 6 ++++-- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Forgot to sign-off?
Yes
> Is this a real problem?
Yes. My thoughts yesterday when I happened to type "git branch -D":
"Wait, I just entered a delete command without a branch name. It did not report anything, which in UNIX world usually means successful operation. _What_ did it delete??"
I knew this code so I just went check. If I did not know, I might as well list all branches I had and see if something was missing. A short message would have saved me the trouble.
> I do not see it particularly wrong to succeed after deleting 0 or > more given branch names.
-- Duy