Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)
- From
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 15, 2020, 21:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CABPp-BFpE=fH7o7K-SLbU=k6NC4YN_jViu0ATeDHaZ+u_5UjGw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CABPp-BF8vo_fCbM1ct0MYFhQcVmPwfq7_Q3Fd+SnM0=gVmxkrQ@mail.gmail.com>
A quick clarification:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:38 PM Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> > It probably doesn't matter at this point, but can I point out an > additional issue with "default"? I worry it's quite likely to lead to > confusion: does "default branch" mean the one named "default" or the > one HEAD points to?
...or the one HEAD *on the central server* points to? (This issue may not be relevant to those that aren't operating with a central repository workflow, but the branch checked out when the user first clones is often thought of as the "default branch".)