From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 21:46:07 GMT
Subject: Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)
Message-ID: <CABPp-BFpE=fH7o7K-SLbU=k6NC4YN_jViu0ATeDHaZ+u_5UjGw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABPp-BF8vo_fCbM1ct0MYFhQcVmPwfq7_Q3Fd+SnM0=gVmxkrQ@mail.gmail.com>

A quick clarification:

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:38 PM Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It probably doesn't matter at this point, but can I point out an
> additional issue with "default"?  I worry it's quite likely to lead to
> confusion: does "default branch" mean the one named "default" or the
> one HEAD points to?

...or the one HEAD *on the central server* points to?  (This issue may
not be relevant to those that aren't operating with a central
repository workflow, but the branch checked out when the user first
clones is often thought of as the "default branch".)