Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)
- From
Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
- Date
- Jun 10, 2020, 09:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.2.21.2006100549070.3771@localhost.localdomain>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAOAHyQzxG7Lc6+PLBtM6oe9vSoEEAmuXAaKF2VzO_phtkfGRVA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020, Simon Pieters wrote:
Show 21 quoted lines
> Hi Junio, > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:02 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: > > > > Simon Pieters <simon@bocoup.com> writes: > > > > > If someone is interested in helping with this, please follow up with > > > Don. But I would like to ask again for git mainline to seriously > > > consider adopting this change, given the information presented above > > > and the ongoing movement against systemic racism. > > > > I am OK in principle if a future version of Git, when used by a new > > user of Git who does not have any custom configuration, wrote a > > string other than 'master' in .git/HEAD when "git init" is run. > > > > Picking a good replacement word to mean the primary branch is > > tricky, though. Just having a notion that one is special among > > many (i.e. the primary-ness of the thing being named with a word > > that will replace 'master') may already be offending to some folks. > > I find this response not satisfactory:
... snip ...
"I can't breathe ... I can't breathe ..."
"Well, tell you what, what if we rename the initial default branch in a distributed version control system for you?"
*Now* do you understand how asinine all this sounds?
rday