Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)
- From
- Oleg <lego_12239@rambler.ru>
- Date
- Jun 18, 2020, 08:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200618083825.GB20837@legohost>
- In-Reply-To
- <CANgJU+WbPgSTxQ=G3sFSvNFQ1cL3onYk5yKLBR=3AqWeEUCfZQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 09:57:42AM +0200, demerphq wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Ultimately if I was the decision maker here I would be choosing terms > that are as workflow agnostic as I can find. "main", "master" and > "primary" are not workflow agnostic, they are if anything a bit > workflow opinionated. "trunk" on the other hand seems pretty > self-descriptive and doesn't have much baggage. It's bark is worse > than its byte however. :-)
The most workflow agnostic name is "branch". it is so neutral that you want to change it ASAP :-).
-- Олег Неманов (Oleg Nemanov)