Re: [PATCH 05/20] sparse-index: implement ensure_full_index()
- From
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 24, 2021, 03:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CABPp-BENXoDXqF1=wNsPvSVBrpJhJfcEhgDtPmCuf13un9ovXw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <2b83989fbcd3d464a3172eeb7cfea2e06e4f3785.1614111270.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 12:14 PM Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 26 quoted lines
> > From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> > > We will mark an in-memory index_state as having sparse directory entries > with the sparse_index bit. These currently cannot exist, but we will add > a mechanism for collapsing a full index to a sparse one in a later > change. That will happen at write time, so we must first allow parsing > the format before writing it. > > Commands or methods that require a full index in order to operate can > call ensure_full_index() to expand that index in-memory. This requires > parsing trees using that index's repository. > > Sparse directory entries have a specific 'ce_mode' value. The macro > S_ISSPARSEDIR(ce->ce_mode) can check if a cache_entry 'ce' has this type. > This ce_mode is not possible with the existing index formats, so we don't > also verify all properties of a sparse-directory entry, which are: > > 1. ce->ce_mode == 0040000 > 2. ce->flags & CE_SKIP_WORKTREE is true > 3. ce->name[ce->namelen - 1] == '/' (ends in dir separator) > 4. ce->oid references a tree object. > > These are all semi-enforced in ensure_full_index() to some extent. Any > deviation will cause a warning at minimum or a failure in the worst > case.
Thanks for spelling these all out; looks good.
Show 17 quoted lines
>
> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
> ---
> cache.h | 7 +++-
> read-cache.c | 9 +++++
> sparse-index.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
> index d92814961405..1336c8d7435e 100644
> --- a/cache.h
> +++ b/cache.h
> @@ -204,6 +204,8 @@ struct cache_entry {
> #error "CE_EXTENDED_FLAGS out of range"
> #endif
>
> +#define S_ISSPARSEDIR(m) ((m) == S_IFDIR)Much nicer, thanks. :-)
Show 33 quoted lines
> +
> /* Forward structure decls */
> struct pathspec;
> struct child_process;
> @@ -319,7 +321,8 @@ struct index_state {
> drop_cache_tree : 1,
> updated_workdir : 1,
> updated_skipworktree : 1,
> - fsmonitor_has_run_once : 1;
> + fsmonitor_has_run_once : 1,
> + sparse_index : 1;
> struct hashmap name_hash;
> struct hashmap dir_hash;
> struct object_id oid;
> @@ -722,6 +725,8 @@ int read_index_from(struct index_state *, const char *path,
> const char *gitdir);
> int is_index_unborn(struct index_state *);
>
> +void ensure_full_index(struct index_state *istate);
> +
> /* For use with `write_locked_index()`. */
> #define COMMIT_LOCK (1 << 0)
> #define SKIP_IF_UNCHANGED (1 << 1)
> diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
> index 29144cf879e7..97dbf2434f30 100644
> --- a/read-cache.c
> +++ b/read-cache.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ static const char *alternate_index_output;
>
> static void set_index_entry(struct index_state *istate, int nr, struct cache_entry *ce)
> {
> + if (S_ISSPARSEDIR(ce->ce_mode))
> + istate->sparse_index = 1;A very minor question -- someone who sees "sparse_index" could probably easily think either "index with missing entries, due to having a SKIP_WORKTREE directory instead" or perhaps "index when using the sparse-checkout feature, i.e. it has some SKIP_WORKTREE entries in it". From the code here, clearly the former is your intent. I wonder if it'd help to have a small comment near the declaration of sparse_index to mention its intent.
Show 116 quoted lines
> +
> istate->cache[nr] = ce;
> add_name_hash(istate, ce);
> }
> @@ -2255,6 +2258,12 @@ int do_read_index(struct index_state *istate, const char *path, int must_exist)
> trace2_data_intmax("index", the_repository, "read/cache_nr",
> istate->cache_nr);
>
> + if (!istate->repo)
> + istate->repo = the_repository;
> + prepare_repo_settings(istate->repo);
> + if (istate->repo->settings.command_requires_full_index)
> + ensure_full_index(istate);
> +
> return istate->cache_nr;
>
> unmap:
> diff --git a/sparse-index.c b/sparse-index.c
> index 82183ead563b..316cb949b74b 100644
> --- a/sparse-index.c
> +++ b/sparse-index.c
> @@ -1,8 +1,101 @@
> #include "cache.h"
> #include "repository.h"
> #include "sparse-index.h"
> +#include "tree.h"
> +#include "pathspec.h"
> +#include "trace2.h"
> +
> +static void set_index_entry(struct index_state *istate, int nr, struct cache_entry *ce)
> +{
> + ALLOC_GROW(istate->cache, nr + 1, istate->cache_alloc);
> +
> + istate->cache[nr] = ce;
> + add_name_hash(istate, ce);
> +}
> +
> +static int add_path_to_index(const struct object_id *oid,
> + struct strbuf *base, const char *path,
> + unsigned int mode, int stage, void *context)
> +{
> + struct index_state *istate = (struct index_state *)context;
> + struct cache_entry *ce;
> + size_t len = base->len;
> +
> + if (S_ISDIR(mode))
> + return READ_TREE_RECURSIVE;
> +
> + strbuf_addstr(base, path);
> +
> + ce = make_cache_entry(istate, mode, oid, base->buf, 0, 0);
> + ce->ce_flags |= CE_SKIP_WORKTREE;
> + set_index_entry(istate, istate->cache_nr++, ce);
> +
> + strbuf_setlen(base, len);
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> void ensure_full_index(struct index_state *istate)
> {
> - /* intentionally left blank */
> + int i;
> + struct index_state *full;
> +
> + if (!istate || !istate->sparse_index)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!istate->repo)
> + istate->repo = the_repository;
> +
> + trace2_region_enter("index", "ensure_full_index", istate->repo);
> +
> + /* initialize basics of new index */
> + full = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct index_state));
> + memcpy(full, istate, sizeof(struct index_state));
> +
> + /* then change the necessary things */
> + full->sparse_index = 0;
> + full->cache_alloc = (3 * istate->cache_alloc) / 2;
> + full->cache_nr = 0;
> + ALLOC_ARRAY(full->cache, full->cache_alloc);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++) {
> + struct cache_entry *ce = istate->cache[i];
> + struct tree *tree;
> + struct pathspec ps;
> +
> + if (!S_ISSPARSEDIR(ce->ce_mode)) {
> + set_index_entry(full, full->cache_nr++, ce);
> + continue;
> + }
> + if (!(ce->ce_flags & CE_SKIP_WORKTREE))
> + warning(_("index entry is a directory, but not sparse (%08x)"),
> + ce->ce_flags);
> +
> + /* recursively walk into cd->name */
> + tree = lookup_tree(istate->repo, &ce->oid);
> +
> + memset(&ps, 0, sizeof(ps));
> + ps.recursive = 1;
> + ps.has_wildcard = 1;
> + ps.max_depth = -1;
> +
> + read_tree_recursive(istate->repo, tree,
> + ce->name, strlen(ce->name),
> + 0, &ps,
> + add_path_to_index, full);
> +
> + /* free directory entries. full entries are re-used */
> + discard_cache_entry(ce);
> + }
> +
> + /* Copy back into original index. */
> + memcpy(&istate->name_hash, &full->name_hash, sizeof(full->name_hash));
> + istate->sparse_index = 0;
> + free(istate->cache);Thanks for fixing that leak that from the RFC series.
Show 10 quoted lines
> + istate->cache = full->cache;
> + istate->cache_nr = full->cache_nr;
> + istate->cache_alloc = full->cache_alloc;
> +
> + free(full);
> +
> + trace2_region_leave("index", "ensure_full_index", istate->repo);
> }
> --
> gitgitgadgetLooks good to me.