Re: [PATCH 3/7] test patch hunk editing with "commit -p -m"

From: Benoit Pierre <benoit.pierre@gmail.com>
Date: Mar 17, 2014, 19:46 UTC
Message-ID: <CA+SSzV3CZjpNaFuf1U1DcPXiKy=rpJH8M2q1xeMvyh9uEHxvOA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqr460ek3k.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

Show 17 quoted lines

> Benoit Pierre <benoit.pierre@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Add (failing) tests: with commit changing the environment to let hooks
>> know that no editor will be used (by setting GIT_EDITOR to ":"), the
>> "edit hunk" functionality does not work (no editor is launched and the
>> whole hunk is committed).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benoit Pierre <benoit.pierre@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  t/t7513-commit-patch.sh | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100755 t/t7513-commit-patch.sh
>>
>> diff --git a/t/t7513-commit-patch.sh b/t/t7513-commit-patch.sh
>
> Again, as I said, I'll rename this to t7514-commit.patch.sh while I
> queue this.

I assumed the "14" was a typo, will rename, but to t7514-commit-patch.sh right? (with 2 '-').

-- 
A: Because it destroys the flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting dumb?