Re: [PATCH] git-send-email: add ~/.authinfo parsing
- From
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
- Date
- Feb 6, 2013, 15:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87sj59mo2y.fsf@lifelogs.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <vpqmwvhxyuj.fsf@grenoble-inp.fr>
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:10:12 +0100 Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:
MM> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes: MM> [...] so the way to go for send-email is probably to libify the MM> credential support in git-remote-mediawiki, and to use it in send-email.
Show 5 quoted lines
>> >> I looked and that's indeed very useful. If it's put in a library, I'd >> use credential_read() and credential_write() in my netrc credential >> helper. But I would formalize it a little more about the token names >> and output,
MM> Can you elaborate on this? The idea of the Perl code was to mimick a MM> call to the C API, keeping essentially the same names.
None of these are a big deal, and Michal said he's working on libifying this anyhow:
- making 'fill' a special operation is weird - anchor the key regex to beginning of line (not strictly necessary) - sort the output tokens (after 'url' is extracted) so the output is consistent and testable
>> and I wouldn't necessarily die() on error.
MM> Sure, die()ing in a library is bad.
>> Maybe this can be merged with the netrc credential helper's >> read_credential_data_from_stdin() and print_credential_data()?
MM> I don't know about the netrc credential helper, but I guess that's MM> another layer. The git-remote-mediawiki code is the code to call the MM> credential C API, that in turn may (or may not) call a credential MM> helper.
Yup. But what you call "read" and "write" are, to the credential helper, "write" and "read" but it's the same protocol :) So maybe the names should be changed to reflect that, e.g. "query" and "response."
MM> One thing to be careful about: git-remote-mediawiki is currently a MM> standalone script, so it can be installed with a plain "cp MM> git-remote-mediawiki $somewhere/". One consequence of libification MM> is that it adds a dependency on the library (e.g. Git.pm). We should MM> be carefull to keep it easy for the user to install it (e.g. some MM> kind of "make install", or update the doc).
I don't know--it's up to the `git-remote-mediawiki' maintainers... But I think anywhere you have Git, you also have Git.pm, right? Maybe? But then you also have to look at whether Git.pm has the functionality you need... so I better go quiet :)
Ted