Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] merge: check config before loading commits
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 30, 2018, 22:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <86po2gfgpp.fsf@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180425143735.240183-10-dstolee@microsoft.com>
Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Now that we use generation numbers from the commit-graph, we must > ensure that all commits that exist in the commit-graph are loaded > from that file instead of from the object database. Since the > commit-graph file is only checked if core.commitGraph is true, we > must check the default config before we load any commits. > > In the merge builtin, the config was checked after loading the HEAD > commit. This was due to the use of the global 'branch' when checking > merge-specific config settings. > > Move the config load to be between the initialization of 'branch' and > the commit lookup.
Sidenote: I wonder why reading config was postponed to later in the command lifetime... I guess it was to avoid having to read config if HEAD was invalid.
Show 6 quoted lines
>
> Without this change, a fast-forward merge would hit a BUG("bad
> generation skip") statement in commit.c during paint_down_to_common().
> This is because the HEAD commit would be loaded with "infinite"
> generation but then reached by commits with "finite" generation
> numbers.I guess this is because we avoid re-parsing objects at all costs; we want to avoid re-reading commit graph too.
> > Add a test to t5318-commit-graph.sh that exercises this code path to > prevent a regression.
I would prefer if this commit was put earlier in the series, to avoid having broken Git (and thus a possibility of problems when bisecting) in between those two commits.
Show 27 quoted lines
>
> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
> ---
> builtin/merge.c | 7 ++++---
> t/t5318-commit-graph.sh | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/merge.c b/builtin/merge.c
> index 5e5e4497e3..b819756946 100644
> --- a/builtin/merge.c
> +++ b/builtin/merge.c
> @@ -1148,14 +1148,15 @@ int cmd_merge(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> branch = branch_to_free = resolve_refdup("HEAD", 0, &head_oid, NULL);
> if (branch)
> skip_prefix(branch, "refs/heads/", &branch);
> +
> + init_diff_ui_defaults();
> + git_config(git_merge_config, NULL);
> +
> if (!branch || is_null_oid(&head_oid))
> head_commit = NULL;
> else
> head_commit = lookup_commit_or_die(&head_oid, "HEAD");
>
> - init_diff_ui_defaults();
> - git_config(git_merge_config, NULL);
> -Good.
Show 19 quoted lines
> if (branch_mergeoptions) > parse_branch_merge_options(branch_mergeoptions); > argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, builtin_merge_options, > diff --git a/t/t5318-commit-graph.sh b/t/t5318-commit-graph.sh > index a380419b65..77d85aefe7 100755 > --- a/t/t5318-commit-graph.sh > +++ b/t/t5318-commit-graph.sh > @@ -221,4 +221,13 @@ test_expect_success 'write graph in bare repo' ' > graph_git_behavior 'bare repo with graph, commit 8 vs merge 1' bare commits/8 merge/1 > graph_git_behavior 'bare repo with graph, commit 8 vs merge 2' bare commits/8 merge/2 > > +test_expect_success 'perform fast-forward merge in full repo' ' > + cd "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/full" && > + git checkout -b merge-5-to-8 commits/5 && > + git merge commits/8 && > + git show-ref -s merge-5-to-8 >output && > + git show-ref -s commits/8 >expect && > + test_cmp expect output > +'
All right. (though I wonder if this tests catches all problems where BUG("bad generation skip") could have been encountered.
> + > test_done
Best,
-- Jakub Narębski