Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] commit: use generations in paint_down_to_common()
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 18, 2018, 14:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <864lk8io21.fsf@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180417170001.138464-4-dstolee@microsoft.com>
Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> writes:
Show 16 quoted lines
> Define compare_commits_by_gen_then_commit_date(), which uses generation > numbers as a primary comparison and commit date to break ties (or as a > comparison when both commits do not have computed generation numbers). > > Since the commit-graph file is closed under reachability, we know that > all commits in the file have generation at most GENERATION_NUMBER_MAX > which is less than GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY. > > This change does not affect the number of commits that are walked during > the execution of paint_down_to_common(), only the order that those > commits are inspected. In the case that commit dates violate topological > order (i.e. a parent is "newer" than a child), the previous code could > walk a commit twice: if a commit is reached with the PARENT1 bit, but > later is re-visited with the PARENT2 bit, then that PARENT2 bit must be > propagated to its parents. Using generation numbers avoids this extra > effort, even if it is somewhat rare.
Does it mean that it gives no measureable performance improvements for typical test cases?
Show 26 quoted lines
>
> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
> ---
> commit.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> commit.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/commit.c b/commit.c
> index 711f674c18..a44899c733 100644
> --- a/commit.c
> +++ b/commit.c
> @@ -640,6 +640,24 @@ static int compare_commits_by_author_date(const void *a_, const void *b_,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int compare_commits_by_gen_then_commit_date(const void *a_, const void *b_, void *unused)
> +{
> + const struct commit *a = a_, *b = b_;
> +
> + /* newer commits first */
> + if (a->generation < b->generation)
> + return 1;
> + else if (a->generation > b->generation)
> + return -1;
> +
> + /* use date as a heuristic when generataions are equal */Very minor typo in above comment:
s/generataions/generations/
Show 31 quoted lines
> + if (a->date < b->date)
> + return 1;
> + else if (a->date > b->date)
> + return -1;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int compare_commits_by_commit_date(const void *a_, const void *b_, void *unused)
> {
> const struct commit *a = a_, *b = b_;
> @@ -789,7 +807,7 @@ static int queue_has_nonstale(struct prio_queue *queue)
> /* all input commits in one and twos[] must have been parsed! */
> static struct commit_list *paint_down_to_common(struct commit *one, int n, struct commit **twos)
> {
> - struct prio_queue queue = { compare_commits_by_commit_date };
> + struct prio_queue queue = { compare_commits_by_gen_then_commit_date };
> struct commit_list *result = NULL;
> int i;
>
> diff --git a/commit.h b/commit.h
> index aac3b8c56f..64436ff44e 100644
> --- a/commit.h
> +++ b/commit.h
> @@ -341,6 +341,7 @@ extern int remove_signature(struct strbuf *buf);
> extern int check_commit_signature(const struct commit *commit, struct signature_check *sigc);
>
> int compare_commits_by_commit_date(const void *a_, const void *b_, void *unused);
> +int compare_commits_by_gen_then_commit_date(const void *a_, const void *b_, void *unused);
>
> LAST_ARG_MUST_BE_NULL
> extern int run_commit_hook(int editor_is_used, const char *index_file, const char *name, ...);