Re: Newbie grief
- From
Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com>
- Date
- May 1, 2012, 18:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <86havzoi8h.fsf@red.stonehenge.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4FA02830.3040407@palm.com>
>>>>> "Rich" == Rich Pixley <rich.pixley@palm.com> writes:
Rich> What I'm talking about is the situation where a branch can have multiple, Rich> childless commits. I've switched to calling these "tips" for this Rich> discussion.
But in git, a branch *is* what you're calling a "tip".
What do you find lacking about git branches, in terms of sharing?
-- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion