From: Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 18:42:54 GMT
Subject: Re: Newbie grief
Message-ID: <86havzoi8h.fsf@red.stonehenge.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FA02830.3040407@palm.com>

>>>>> "Rich" == Rich Pixley <rich.pixley@palm.com> writes:

Rich> What I'm talking about is the situation where a branch can have multiple,
Rich> childless commits.  I've switched to calling these "tips" for this
Rich> discussion.

But in git, a branch *is* what you're calling a "tip".

What do you find lacking about git branches, in terms of sharing?

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion