Re: Newbie grief
- From
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
- Date
- May 4, 2012, 15:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120504155606.GB30130@sirena.org.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <4FA2F013.3020904@palm.com>
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:52:35PM -0700, Rich Pixley wrote:
> It's not just hg. It's other source code control systems as well. > Check out any of the other daggy guys. So sure, I'll admit a bias > for current technology over older tech.
I'm still not sure what's missing here without a central server? The other DVCSs I've used (which don't include hg) do require that the user trigger a merge operation somehow; they don't magically go and merge things without being asked. The only thing I've noticed that git does differently is that it caches the remote branches locally by default when remotes are set up.