Re: Newbie grief
- From
- Rich Pixley <rich.pixley@palm.com>
- Date
- May 3, 2012, 18:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4FA2D295.1090405@palm.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMOZ1BuiznhrzEOHe0N+uu=mLEw5wWTQyDpnwG8PuF1f_aNaXw@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/1/12 15:56 , Michael Witten wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Rich Pixley<rich.pixley@palm.com> wrote: > >> In contrast, I was up and using mercurial in about a day and a half, >> including all of the stuff we've discussed, and all of the things I've even >> read about in git. Learning mq's only took about 20 minutes. > Fortunately, git is based on extremely simple principles. > Unfortunately, git grew out of really bright people hacking stuff > together in order to get sh!t dun; the result is not approachably or > even well documented, the UI is sometimes a bit of a kludge, the API > is probably nonexistent, and the terminology is so loosely thrown > about that it's easy to forget which way is up in discussions. > (Note, though, that Junio has done a laudable job of keeping the > whole experiment going strong).
Thank you for acknowledging that.
> Having recognized these deficiencies, I suggest that you provide > at least one tiny little use case that doesn't work as you'd > like; it should be in the form of a command line example that we > can all reproduce and discuss precisely.
I think I already have. And you've given me an approach that is largely functional in git. It's not wonderful, but it's mostly functional.
I'll post my comparison elsepost.
--rich