Re: epic fsck SIGSEGV!
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 11, 2008, 07:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vy6yntaej.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.2.00.0812101930590.3340@localhost.localdomain>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> It has gotten no real testing. Caveat emptor. And I didn't even bother to > check that it can run with less stack or that it makes any other > difference.
A quick "git fsck --full" in a copy of git.git (eh, "not-so-quick" on a not-so-quick machine, obviously) shows that the patch does reduce minor faults significantly.
(without patch) 83.03user 0.60system 1:23.62elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+158275minor)pagefaults 0swaps
(with object_array patch) 82.88user 0.40system 1:23.28elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+95397minor)pagefaults 0swaps