Re: epic fsck SIGSEGV!
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 11, 2008, 07:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v63lrupxk.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.2.00.0812101930590.3340@localhost.localdomain>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> I dunno. I like this patch better. It's a bit larger. I think it's a bit > more clearly separated (ie a "mark_object_reachable()" _literally_ just > puts the object on a list, and the whole traversal is a whole separate > phase), but I guess it's a matter of taste.
... which happens to match mine in this case ;-)
I'll consider this signed-off and do the usual forging (for people new on the list, Cf. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/19031).