Re: git-subtree Ready #2
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 25, 2012, 09:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vy5rrfft2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <87hayfv75y.fsf@smith.obbligato.org>
greened@obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> writes: > >> Should we filter-branch or rebase the history first, or just leave it as is? >> >> Like I said, since I don't expect there to be any more back-and-forth >> development, rebasing should be pretty harmless. > > Catching up on e-mail. :) > > I'm happy to do either (rebase or filter-branch). Just let me know.
I would understand Avery's "should we filter-branch/rebase, or is it OK as-is?", but I do not understand what you mean by "either rebase or filter-branch is fine".
> I'm about the send the test-lib.sh patch separately...
Thanks, this I understand and should not be a part of git-subtree topic.